ChatGPT/Every illustration.

What the Em Dash Says About AI-assisted Writing—And Us

Good writing is about more than a punctuation mark

64 1

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox.


A few Fridays ago, there was an awkward silence at Every’s editorial meeting.

Six floating heads of writers and editors on Zoom blinked at each other, petrified by a punctuation mark—the em dash.

ChatGPT loooves the em dash—arguably, a bit too much—to the point that it’s become a tell-tale sign of AI-generated writing. (See what I did there?) On the call, we worried—should we avoid using it because it makes our writing sound like AI?

This could be dismissed as a bunch of writers being unduly precious, and maybe we were. But the reason we—and many human writers—are anxious about using em dashes has little to do with punctuation—it’s about trust. (OK, OK, I’ll stop.)

As you scroll down this page, I’m asking for yours: I’m gently taking your hand and inviting you into my thoughts. All the while, a crucial subtext is there saying, in effect: I thought about this, and I cared. You can trust that I did, even if you don’t agree with what I said.

And now a punctuation mark threatens that trust. What I fear most isn’t that my writing will be mistaken for AI, it’s that someone—my editors, fellow writers, or maybe even you—will assume that it didn’t come from a place of care.

AI is rapidly being adopted for its ability to help people accomplish a range of tasks, including writing, more quickly. An increasing number of business leaders now require it. Many writers, though, are facing backlash if their work contains signs of AI use. In some cases, they’re being fired for it. Readers are passing judgment on writing based on appearances, without actually engaging with it. And that’s a problem. (Factual inaccuracies in articles because the writer used AI are, of course, unacceptable.)

We’re living through a moment when the question of how something was made threatens to eclipse what it’s trying to say. Why are we so quick to judge writing based on superficial signs of AI? There has to be a better way to evaluate work that uses it. Instead of asking how something was made, perhaps we should ask whether it’s good—and how we might learn to tell.

Let’s dive in.

What the em dash debate tells us about ourselves

Create a free account to continue reading

The Only Subscription
You Need to Stay at the
Edge of AI

The essential toolkit for those shaping the future

"This might be the best value you
can get from an AI subscription."

- Jay S.

Mail Every Content
AI&I Podcast AI&I Podcast
Monologue Monologue
Cora Cora
Sparkle Sparkle
Spiral Spiral

Join 100,000+ leaders, builders, and innovators

Community members

Already have an account? Sign in

What is included in a subscription?

Daily insights from AI pioneers + early access to powerful AI tools

Pencil Front-row access to the future of AI
Check In-depth reviews of new models on release day
Check Playbooks and guides for putting AI to work
Check Prompts and use cases for builders

Comments

You need to login before you can comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up!
@federicoescobarcordoba 6 months ago

I've loved em dashes for decades, so it's a shame they've become markers of AI writing. Perhaps AI picked up on them because they're such effective punctuation—much like the semicolon that Cecelia Watson defends in a NYT essay (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/09/magazine/the-case-for-semicolons.html). The em dash is so versatile that it's even infiltrated Spanish (the other language I habitually write in), where formal rules technically forbid the single dash.

Your point about moving beyond AI detection hits the mark. Good writing teachers could transform this moment of anxiety into opportunity. Imagine asking students to rewrite their handwritten work to sound like it came from a non-frontier AI model. What changes did they make? Why does AI write that way? Or flip it: take a piece written by a basic AI model and elevate it. What improvements did you make, and why?

Em dashes have long been the tool of masterful writers. Consider this 75-word microfiction piece and how skillfully it deploys em dashes to create rhythm and meaning in such a compressed space: https://www.smokelong.com/stories/thirteen/. That's the kind of intentional punctuation use we should be teaching—and celebrating.