DALL-E/Every illustration.

Falling Out of Love With Michael Lewis

The complicated demands of business writing

322 17

Comments

You need to login before you can comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up!
Morgan Lewis almost 2 years ago

love a good takedown of a total sellout !

Craig Gordon almost 2 years ago

totally agree with your analysis of book..although haven't read it and was on my list to read after reading yours and few other reviews especially LA times one I have decided to read Number Go Up by bloomberg reporter Zele Faux....might be good recommendation to your readers. Thanks for the honest take

Ben Springwater almost 2 years ago

@cg "I agree with your book review even though I didn't read the book." Um...

Anne Amoury almost 2 years ago

I was about to buy this book yesterday at the airport. But after thumbing through the pages filled with italicized convo’s or journal entries or whatever they were, I returned it to the shelf. Seemed awfully lazy for a book that should be packed with insight and analysis. Talk about a lost opportunity to enlighten readers about the impossibly complicated, bizarre crypto universe.

As a fellow sometimes-fan of Michael Lewis, I share your disappointment. Huge missed opportunity to shed light on what happened with FTX.

Robert Caro he ain’t.

This is my favorite of your essays so far. Keep up the great work.

Evan Armstrong almost 2 years ago

@anneamoury Thanks Anne! appreciate it.

@dhaval2thewall almost 2 years ago

That was a great insight and analysis not only about Going Infinite but also on comparison with Elon Musk’s biography.

Chester Cressman almost 2 years ago

What I liked was your revealing the fact that being entertaining is more profitable than being truthful, and the bias that has on writing. As someone that, at least intellectually, values truth far above entertainment, how do I filter out the stuff that has a loose association with the truth, and find more of the truth?

Evan Armstrong almost 2 years ago

@Chester Cressman the answer is obvious—you should be a napkin math reader ;) this is a frustrating answer but if you find a writer who isn't particularly entertaining but has been doing it for a long-time that is a good filter.

@alexpoterack almost 2 years ago

Did you read the same book as me? I read that book and I felt like it painted SBF as a huge asshole. Like, he's talking about a company that very notably and publicly went bankrupt, so when he talks about how "no one at [FTX] knew their title, job description, or who they reported to," he's not describing how good SBF is at managing, he describing how much of a trainwreck he was. When he repeatedly describes SBF as being callous, uncaring, and blowing people off, I don't think he's saying, "This guy was just too focused to spend time on that stuff," I think he's saying this guy is an asshole. The quote from the book that sticks in my mind the most is SBF saying, "There's a functional religion around the CFO. I'll ask [investors], 'Why do I need one?' Some people cannot articulate a single thing the CFO is supposed to do. They'll say 'keep track of the money,' or 'make projections.' I'm like, What the fuck do you think I do all day? You think I don't know how much money we have?" He didn't know how much money they have! That's not a, "oh, look at this cool rebel who's smarter than all the people who think they know better" quote, that's a, "Look at this hubristic asshole who thought he knew better, then it all blew up in his face," quote.

Ben Springwater almost 2 years ago

@alexpoterack This nails it.

josh spilker almost 2 years ago

good analysis. i really liked moneyball and then the football parts of the blind side. I was excited for this book, but have seen so much negative about it that I'll probably skip. He had a huge opportunity and seems to have wasted it.

I did pick up zeke faux's "competing" book and it's definitely a more cynical view of crypto.

Evan Armstrong almost 2 years ago

@joshspilker I think I only have so many crypto books in me—think I need to purify my brain. Reading Blood in the Machine and the new Romney bio next.

Lloyd Nebres almost 2 years ago

Then... Lewis' defense was so patently obvious that it made your essay so easy to write, yes? ::chuckle:: This thing flowed like quicksilver, and with such elegant unrebuttability (that even a word? ::thinking emoji::), it's almost cruel. Balloon, meet needle.

@pezalinski almost 2 years ago

Sounds like ML has morphed into a human ChatGPT... 30 percent accurate, but readable and entertaining.

Kay Kenney almost 2 years ago

Thank you for this review. After watching Lewis interviewed and recounting SBF's outraged crimes in such a glib manner I looked back other times I found his writing to cute by half.

Ben Springwater almost 2 years ago

It’s possible Lewis was softer on SBF than warranted but I didn’t think your characterization of his book was accurate. Lewis didn’t portray SBF in a favorable light. He just didn’t present evidence that he committed fraud.

I think your reading of the Kelsey Piper conversation is wrong and EA was indeed central to SBF’s worldview. Lewis addressed it in a very interesting interview in Time. The interview actually changed my perception of the entire Lewis saga. I recommend it: https://time.com/6321668/michael-lewis-sam-bankman-fried-going-infinite

Ben Springwater almost 2 years ago

Interesting response in Time interview:

TIME: You’ve received waves of criticism on Twitter from people who accuse you of being too sympathetic to Sam. How do you feel about all the vitriol you’re receiving?

LEWIS: This is what happens when you address a mob, is what it feels like. I don’t think the mob is the only voice here that matters. I’m not his defense lawyer. There’s plenty in the book that I’m sure he would not like to be in the book. It happens to arise out of actually spending an awful lot of time investigating the situation itself.

The anger seems, to me, to be like a separate force and part of American life right now, rather than something that's rational and tied to actual agreements. Lord knows the very easy, lazy thing to do right now would be to throw Sam under every bus you could, and try to make him seem as bad as possible, because people respond to that. But it just wouldn't be true. It's not the character I knew. It's not the situation I knew.

There’s a long history of people getting in trouble for books that are right, and the books end up being extremely valuable. I've had this a couple of times in my career. This reminds me, oddly, of when Moneyball came out. There was such fury. The scouts were really upset, their jobs were threatened and their friends wrote for the local newspapers. I couldn't turn on the television set for a year.

In other words, there was a tribe waiting to be that was natively hostile to the ideas that were in the book. And in this case, again, it felt like there's a tribe waiting that were natively hostile to the truth of the story I experienced. All you can do is write it; I can't make stuff up to make you happy.