Claude Code Camp: The Workflows Turning One Engineer Into Ten

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox.

“What do a jet ski and Claude Code have in common?”

That’s how Sparkle general manager Yash Poojary opened his presentation at the latest Claude Code Camp, our live event series where Every’s engineers share how they use Claude Code in production and answer subscriber questions.

The chat filled with answers: They’re both fast, extra fun with friends, and reckless if you don’t know what you’re doing. It was a joke—but also a sharp metaphor for Claude’s new subagents.

Anthropic only released subagents a month ago, but Every’s engineers are already weaving them into their daily workflows for Spiral, Cora, and Sparkle. (The latter is launching a new feature tomorrow built with techniques we discuss here.)

The lessons are adding up quickly, and not only for the humans. When you’re following the principles of compounding engineering—building development systems that learn from your feedback—every workflow improvement makes the next one easier. Subagents fit perfectly into this philosophy, because each one can learn to apply your standards consistently and get better with every task.

Here are the biggest takeaways from this session of Claude Code Camp, plus demos from our engineers and highlights from the live Q&A.

Key takeaways

1. Create subagents (more about them below) when the work repeats. They shine once you spot a task you don’t want to do again.
2. Work in parallel, not sequence. Running up to 10 agents at once turns long, linear work into something more like a team tackling tasks in unison.
3. Each subagent keeps its own notes. Subagents hold their own memory, so they can carry logs, specs, or architecture notes without cluttering your main session.
4. Treat them like teammates. Codify your standards once and the subagents will apply them every time, like a junior engineer who’s already onboarded.

Bland Is the Most Powerful Voice AI in the World

In fact, chances are, you’ve already spoken to it without even noticing. Companies from Fortune 500’s to startups have been using Bland to build AI voice agents for sales, support, and much more. It can:

1. Answer phone, SMS, and web‑chat requests 24/7—no hold music, no queues
2. Scale to 1 million-plus simultaneous conversations while slashing support costs
3. Speak any language and connect to any backend CRM, ticketing, or data source
4. Stay on‑brand with guard‑railed reasoning that prevents hallucinations and off‑script replies

Hundreds of enterprises and high‑growth startups already trust Bland to boost CSAT, cut resolution times, and free up agents for higher‑value work.

Curious? Call the number in the image, or Every readers can get started here for free.

Want to sponsor Every? Click here.

What are subagents, and what are they for?

A subagent is a lightweight AI program you can spin up for a specific role. Think of them as separate conversation windows with specialized instructions. Each one has its own system prompt, its own memory, and access to the same tools as Claude Code in general. They can run in sequence or in parallel—up to 10 at once. “Claude started as an individual contributor for you,” explained Dan Shipper, CEO of Every. “With subagents, it’s becoming a team lead. It can now manage a team of its own agents to get work done.”

When to create a subagent

The temptation when you first learn about subagents is to build out a library of 20 or 30 all at once. Dan cautioned against it: “If you do that, you just won’t use them. A better approach is to notice when you’re repeating a task, and create an agent in that moment.”

Kieran Klaassen, general manager of our AI email management tool Cora, shared an example. He needed to add metricsI tracking with Ahoy, something he’d set up before and knew he’d need again. “Normally I’d have to refresh myself on how I did it last time. Instead, I created an Ahoy tracking expert agent. Now Claude knows how to do it every time.” For Kieran, the key is to think of subagents the way a tech lead would think about onboarding: Codify the steps once, so you don’t have to repeat yourself later.

Why subagents are powerful

The strength of subagents is structure. They break work into roles, encode judgment into loops, and carry context forward in ways a single coding session cannot.

1. They compound learning. A subagent set up with your standards will improve with each run, like a junior teammate who learns quickly.
2. They create feedback loops. An executor subagent writes code; an evaluator subagent reviews it. An argument between two agents surfaces better answers.
3. They unlock context. Each subagent holds its own memory, so your main thread stays clear.
4. They enforce taste. By applying feedback to future cases, , subagents maintain consistency across projects and reflect your preferences over time.

Patterns emerging in real workflows

Once subagents move from idea to daily use, certain patterns show up again and again. These are the practical shortcuts our engineers have discovered. Each one shows a different way to turn lightweight agents into reliable teammates.

Executor/evaluator loop: ​​One subagent does the work, another reviews it

When you generate code or text with an AI, it tends to be overconfident about its own output. A good trick is to split the workflow into two roles: one “executor” that does the work, and one “evaluator” that reviews it. This creates a natural feedback loop that improves quality.

Danny Aziz, general manager of our writing tool Spiral, showed how he uses this pattern for Spiral’s onboarding screens. His UI engineer subagent takes mockups from Figma and translates them into working React components (a programming framework for building web apps). A second subagent, the implementation reviewer, compares the code against the design and requests revisions. Because each has its own context window, the reviewer isn’t biased by the executor’s memory, and they iterate back and forth until the implementation matches the design.

Opponent processors: Two subagents argue to reach better decisions

Sometimes the best way to reach a good decision is to generate two opposing perspectives and let them argue it out. Subagents are perfect for this because they can each hold a different role or agenda.

Dan showed how he used two subagents to audit his expenses. One agent played “Dan,” trying to justify as many expenses as possible. The other played “the company,” pushing to minimize costs. Claude mediated between them and delivered a balanced report.

Feedback codifier: Learns from your code review comments

AI agents work best when they have access to your past decisions and preferences. By codifying your feedback into a reusable format, you ensure future agents don’t repeat the same mistakes.

Danny demonstrated his feedback codifier agent. After leaving comments on a pull request (a draft of code changes submitted for review), he ran the codifier. It extracted the lessons and stored them in his Claude.md file—a project-specific document that functions like an instruction manual. The next time Claude reviews code, it already knows Danny’s standards.

Research agent: Finds solutions and tradeoffs from similar projects

Before building a new feature, developers often scan open-source projects to see how others solved similar problems. This saves time and avoids pitfalls, but it can be tedious. A research subagent can automate the search and summarize what matters.

That’s how Yash built the new search feature for Sparkle, the AI-powered file organizer for Mac. Sparkle users kept asking, “How do I find my files once they’re organized?” The research agent produced a report that mapped how other apps approached indexing and performance indicators like search speed, flagged trade-offs, and highlighted best practices. Work that would have taken Yash days of exploration took hours instead.

The result is Sparkle Search: a faster, more reliable way to find files in Sparkle, born from the same workflow we use to ship code every day. Try it out and update Sparkle to 1.5.7 when it launches tomorrow. We're using this ourselves daily and would love feedback on what works (or doesn't) for your workflow.

Log investigator: Digs through error logs and returns only what matters

Error logs can be long and messy, but they usually contain the key to solving a bug. Subagents can analyze the full log in their own memory (as opposed to a shared memory) and return only the relevant details.

Kieran showed his log investigator agent. When something breaks, he asks the agent to parse the logs, identify what’s going wrong, and report back with the key details. “Sometimes you just want a clean slate in your terminal,” he said. “The log investigator can do the digging and bring back what matters.”

The Q&A

We wrapped the session with a live Q&A. Here’s a selection of the most useful ones, including a few we didn’t have time for during the event.

Slash commands versus subagents

In Claude Code, a slash command is like a shortcut prompt—you trigger a pre-defined instruction with /plan or /review. A subagent is a more dedicated teammate. Commands kick off a workflow; subagents carry their own memory and can be reused across sessions.

Q: When should I use a slash command and when should I make a subagent?

“They are similar, but should be used together. Slash commands are really good for starting work—things like planning a big feature or doing a first pass review. Subagents are more like colleagues you call in mid-stream. If you’re halfway through a build and need a second opinion, or you want someone to go pull logs without messing up your main context, that’s a good time for a subagent.”—Kieran

Workflows versus subagents

Q: How do workflows compare to subagents?

“Workflows are broader sequences of steps that might involve multiple tools and agents, while subagents are specialized AI workers with their own context windows. Think of workflows as the recipe and subagents as the specialized chefs—you might have a workflow for ‘ship a feature’ that calls different subagents for research, implementation, and review.”—Yash

“Workflows are more structured, like [the workflow automation platform] Zapier. Agents are more fluid, because they can decide for themselves how to work without a structure around them.”—Kieran

Project agents versus personal agents

Some agents are written to live inside a single project, while others follow an engineer across everything they do.

Q: Do you create agents as project agents or personal agents?

“I use project agents 90 percent of the time because I like to write them in ways that are specific to the project—what’s our [tech] stack, [or] some weird hacks we have in the codebase the agent should know.”—Danny

Parallel execution

Q: Can Claude run the same agent multiple times in parallel?

“Yes, Claude can run multiple instances of the same agent in parallel. Just tell Claude explicitly. ‘Run 10 parallel research agents on these different topics.’ Each gets its own context window, so they won’t step on each other. Super useful for analyzing large codebases or documents.”—Yash

Token usage and cost

Multi-agent setups can look expensive on paper, but most developers don’t think in terms of token math.

Q: What token usage do you see in multi-agent tasks?

“I literally never look at this.”—Danny

“Same. I don't think this is a problem in coding. $200 per month gives me enough all the time.”—Kieran

Feedback and code reviews

Even with subagents, there are moments when the fastest move is still writing the code yourself.

Q: Do you still have to write code manually? How do agents learn from PR reviews?

“Yes, but only for the 5 percent of things that are either a little too complicated for me to accurately prompt for or the things that are just quicker for me to do (copy-paste, mass-edit jobs).”—Danny

When to call agents

Claude can be told when to invoke subagents automatically, or you can call them in manually.

Q: Can you tell Claude when to invoke agents—for example, via Claude.md?

"I actually prefer calling the agents myself via the @ syntax.”—Danny

“I’m with Danny—I prefer explicit @ mentions about 80 percent of the time. I do put hints in Claude.md for when agents might be useful, but I rarely rely on automatic invocation.”—Yash

Safety and guardrails

Q: Do subagents respect the same safety hooks for sensitive files and tool use?

“Subagents inherit the same safety restrictions as the main Claude instance. They can’t access files you’ve marked as sensitive and respect the same tool permissions. Think of them as having the same security clearance as their parent.”—Yash

Observability

“Observability” refers to being able to see what your system is doing through logs and metrics. For subagents, there aren’t polished dashboards yet. Our team pieces together what they need.

Q: Are you using any observability tools with Claude Code?

“Not using any formal observability tools—just git history and Claude’s conversation logs.”—Yash

Katie Parrott is a staff writer and AI editorial lead at Every. You can read more of her work in her newsletter.

To read more essays like this, subscribe to Every, and follow us on X at @every and on LinkedIn.

We build AI tools for readers like you. Write brilliantly with Spiral. Organize files automatically with Sparkle. Deliver yourself from email with Cora.

We also do AI training, adoption, and innovation for companies. Work with us to bring AI into your organization.

Get paid for sharing Every with your friends. Join our referral program.