Divinations Podcast #003 — Discussing Sonos’s moat (or lack thereof)

Whether or not you’ve already had the chance to read Does Sonos have a moat?, I think you’ll love this week’s conversation with Adam Keesling.

Tip: to subscribe to Divinations in your podcast app, click the “Listen in podcast app” link by the audio player above!

Here’s what we talked about:

  • Minute 0–5: So, does Sonos have a moat? Not in the same way that Google or Facebook does, but they do have a premium, differentiated product with a good brand and probably have good unit economics. Also they can “land and expand” because people buy multiple speakers.
  • Minute 5–14: How did Sonos start? What was the problem they were solving? How’d their launch go?
  • Minute 14–18: Once streaming music became a thing (Pandora, Spotify, etc), how did Sonos respond?
  • Minute 18–25: Should Sonos have made headphones? Why didn’t they?
  • Minute 25–32: What impact have smart speakers and voice assistants had on Sonos’s strategy? Why doesn’t Apple allow Sonos to integrate Siri into their product, but Apple and Amazon do?
  • Minute 32–49: How does Clay Christensen’s Law of Attractive Profits help us decode Sonos’s strategic position?

Enjoy!

Like this?
Become a subscriber.

Subscribe →

Or, learn more.

Read this next:

Thanks for rating this post—join the conversation by commenting below.

Comments

You need to login before you can comment.
Don't have an account? Sign up!

Every smart person you know is reading this newsletter

Get one actionable essay a day on AI, tech, and personal development

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Login